From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70539 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:49:56 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87hbi45bcr.fsf@dod.no> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283709316 7459 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2010 17:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 17:55:16 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18914=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 05 19:55:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJQw-00080o-On for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJQw-0004sF-4n for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJQv-0004s9-8V for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJQq-0003He-W3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OsJQq-0003Es-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55:08 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsJQm-0007uc-61 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55:04 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55:04 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:55:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FmNXTo2gB1HPZAWpsi5RrJRyLWI= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70539 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > It's really complicated code, especially the things that deal with the > network connection and filters and stuff, which just seems kinda > unnecessary. I mean, the protocol is dead simple. You issue a > (numbered) command, and you get a (numbered) response. I can't remember but I think that some of the complexity came from trying to shoehorn IMAP into the backend API at the time, and the assumptions made by a backend intended for NNTP. But perhaps the backend API has been changed to be a better fit since then...?