From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69664
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: jidanni@jidanni.org
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: different colors for different marks, please
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 04:38:02 +0800
Message-ID: <87hbmmt785.fsf@jidanni.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273097569 4284 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2010 22:12:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 22:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18055@lists.math.uh.edu Thu May 06 00:12:48 2010
connect(): No such file or directory
Return-path: <ding-owner+M18055@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M18055@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1O9mpi-0005uI-IB
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 00:12:46 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M18055@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1O9moC-0007jI-RY; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:11:12 -0500
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1O9moB-0007j4-Jd
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:11:11 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1O9mo9-0005I9-PV
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 May 2010 17:11:10 -0500
Original-Received: from caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.66] helo=homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1O9mo7-0007iB-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 06 May 2010 00:11:07 +0200
Original-Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-146.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.146])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012E6BCD46
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed,  5 May 2010 15:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows
	Bayesian score:   0.4753
	Ham tokens:       0.000-94--159h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-89--151h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.001-16--26h-0s--0d--hmmm, 0.002-698--1207h-9s--0d--H*r:cipher, 0.002-151--261h-2s--0d--H*r:certificate
	Spam tokens:      0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--H*r:sk:218-163, 0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:218-163, 0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--H*RU:sk:218-163, 0.962-121--33h-2708s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.950-107--44h-2667s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org
	Autolearn status: ham
	0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4753]
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69664
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69664>

I notice the colors for the r and E marks are the same, i.e.,
gnus-summary-normal-read. Why not use a different scheme for E?
Hmmm, gnus-summary-low-read? Same goes for other marks sharing the same colors/fonts.