Re: spam.el reporting and moving ham out of spam groups.

[asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)]

On Wed, 26 May 2004 22:29:15 +0200, Adam wrote:

> On 26 May 2004 12:16:07 -0400, Ted wrote:
>> But shouldn't spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups do this? If it
>> doesn't, there's a bug in my code.

> I just tested with latest cvs; yes it does work.

Uh, it gets processed, but not respooled.

I enter nnml:spam; these are the group parameters:

((spam-process
  '(ham spam-use-crm114))
 (ham-process-destination
  'respool)
 (spam-process-destination . "nnml:spam")
 (ham-marks
  (gnus-ticked-mark))

I mark (!) some articles that are ham and exit the group (q) - the
articles are registred as ham:

 Registering 6  articles as ham using backend spam-use-crm114

But they are not respooled.

If I enter nnml:spam again, the articles are still ticked, and B q
returns "cvs" (the group they should have been respooled to).

Shouldn't they be moved (respooled)?


I'm setting this in .gnus:

 spam-log-to-registry t
 spam-junk-mailgroups nil ; Everything must be unclassified.
 spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only t ; Only process spam in nonspam groups.
 spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups t
 spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups t
 spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t
 spam-use-crm114 t


Maybe I need to set "spam-move-ham-in-nonham-groups" to t?


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Our voodoo-dolls are full of hopes"                         Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk