From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46074 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 00:27:52 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87hei5vvdj.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> References: <873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <20020801222925.A10502@mastaler.com> <02Aug5.143835edt.119445@gateway.intersystems.com> <02Aug5.174118edt.119294@gateway.intersystems.com> <874re5wvrc.fsf@home.lan> <87y9bhw2bw.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> <87lm7hvy0r.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028845713 28994 127.0.0.1 (8 Aug 2002 22:28:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17cvlg-0007XX-00 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 00:28:32 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17cvlR-0004FA-00; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 17:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 08 Aug 2002 17:28:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA27950 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 17:28:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 25452 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 22:27:54 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25447 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 22:27:53 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by gnus.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 22:27:53 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17cw6X-0002Wt-00 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 00:50:05 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 18 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: b48sfn.cm.chello.no Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1028847005 8984 213.46.211.96 (8 Aug 2002 22:50:05 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Aug 2002 22:50:05 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cas7RL/LRV7v9VVyg2jrhcCTuP4= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46074 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46074 >>>>> prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc): > ... Do you mean you would want your TMDA to reply to the From > addresses in incoming messages to you? Yes. What's in the From: field is what I would like to have validated. I don't care if the envelope address is valid or not, since that's not what Gnus uses when I press `r'. > That would make your TMDA different from everyone else's, so it > wouldn't be what they expect, thus not what they're prepared for, > thus not what they want. What does what other people want have to do with how I set up my own TMDA? Besides, most people don't know what envelope addresses are, so why would they care, one way or another?