From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>
Subject: Re: db-backed mail back end
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:37:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hepbdrsj.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vxkd6zz6rls.fsf@cinnamon.vanillaknot.com> (Karl Kleinpaste's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:23:43 -0500")
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>> Yes. And that's not acceptable. If it takes 7.5 seconds to enter a
>> group to look at the one new article, then that's too slow. Much,
>> much, much too slow.
>
> Sorry, no, I don't buy it.
Lucky you. :)
> Every day, people use Gnus to enter NNTP groups with 100, 500, 1000,
> or 2000 new articles to scan, sort, and maybe even read a few.
Sure. I also enter some groups with, say, two messages to read, like the
ding list just now... that take seven to ten seconds to enter.
> Every time they do this, they spend tens of seconds while threading,
> scoring, sorting, and summary generation occur. This sort of use is of
> the all-day-every-day kind.
It would be /great/ for it to be faster, especially in groups where
there are ticked, visible messages from a long time ago.
> Yet you want to optimize the case that's so far out to the edge, I
> doubt there's anyone that even actually _has_ a single group with 200K
> messages in it, against which to test the planned optimization. (Does
> anyone? Really, right now?
Nope. I peak at > 90,000 messages at the moment, with the ten most
active groups running down from there to ~ 12,000 messages.
> Does anyone have a group, or does anyone plan to create a group, that
> goes beyond, say, 30K messages?)
Yes.
[...]
> There's certainly no harm to making Gnus able to handle the storage
> needs of gargantuan archives. Sure, knock yourself out. But that's
> not a problem currently being faced by more than maybe 5 people on the
> planet, whereas every single Gnus user has to worry over the entry
> time cost of a busy group with 900 new messages.
That would be something that would be good to address first. Don't
mistake it for the only problem, though.
Daniel
--
Sticks and stones are hard on bones.
Aimed with angry art, Words can sting like anything.
But silence breaks the heart.
-- Phyllis McGinley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-22 23:33 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-23 0:23 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-23 0:36 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-23 0:49 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-01-23 1:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-23 1:34 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-23 2:39 ` John S. J. Anderson
2002-01-24 1:18 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 14:37 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2002-01-23 3:46 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-24 0:51 ` Russ Allbery
2002-01-23 8:52 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-01-26 20:55 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-23 11:45 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-01-23 14:11 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-23 14:26 ` Mark Milhollan
2002-01-24 1:19 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-23 17:50 ` Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 0:50 ` Russ Allbery
2002-01-24 1:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 1:49 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-24 8:36 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 8:58 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-24 9:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 10:37 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-24 17:11 ` Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 17:58 ` nnmaildir (was: db-backed mail back end) Josh Huber
2002-01-24 18:14 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 18:43 ` Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 22:05 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-24 22:51 ` nnmaildir Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 18:39 ` nnmaildir Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 9:14 ` db-backed mail back end Sean Neakums
2002-01-24 9:59 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-01-24 10:03 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 10:24 ` Sean Neakums
2002-01-24 11:49 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-24 11:32 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-01-24 11:58 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-24 12:11 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 12:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 12:54 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-24 15:05 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 20:40 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-25 1:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 2:17 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-25 2:42 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 3:23 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-25 3:34 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 3:37 ` Daniel Pittman [this message]
2002-01-25 4:19 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-25 4:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 9:23 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 9:30 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 9:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 9:58 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 10:04 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 10:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 12:12 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 12:19 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 13:15 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 13:59 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 15:43 ` Kai Großjohann
[not found] ` <m3y9immn0r.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
[not found] ` <m3u1tammvs.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
2002-01-25 17:01 ` Kai Großjohann
[not found] ` <2nbsfitmtx.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu>
2002-01-25 17:19 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 17:33 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-26 11:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-26 11:31 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-26 19:03 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-27 1:29 ` Raja R Harinath
2002-01-27 1:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-26 22:17 ` Christoph Conrad
2002-01-28 14:25 ` Jan Vroonhof
2002-01-29 2:34 ` Russ Allbery
2002-01-26 21:10 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-25 5:32 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-25 4:29 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 5:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 5:29 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 5:39 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-25 5:48 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 7:05 ` Justin Sheehy
2002-01-28 12:56 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-24 16:13 ` Frank Schmitt
2002-01-24 18:36 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-01-24 12:29 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-01-25 14:40 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2002-01-24 13:50 ` Zlatko Calusic
2002-01-24 22:27 ` Zlatko Calusic
2002-01-25 2:57 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-25 4:42 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 14:51 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-24 17:14 ` Paul Jarc
2002-01-24 17:52 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-01-23 0:53 ` Nevin Kapur
2002-01-23 1:29 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-23 1:45 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-23 2:33 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-24 1:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-24 2:05 ` Jorge Godoy
2002-01-24 8:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-27 22:32 ` Rob Browning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hepbdrsj.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net \
--to=daniel@rimspace.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).