From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/40415 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gpg-ring.el/gpg.el? Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:43:13 -0500 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87herqeecu.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87k7wqjzvo.fsf@mclinux.com> <87lmh6mm62.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87bshyvm55.fsf@mclinux.com> <87snbalgcp.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175968 779 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:52:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5804 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 19:44:52 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2001 19:44:52 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 165uJi-0005jS-00; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:42:54 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:42:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA05946 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:42:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 5782 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 19:42:26 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5777 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 19:42:25 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (HELO quimby2.netfonds.no) (195.204.10.66) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2001 19:42:25 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby2.netfonds.no with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 165uRN-0004Lf-00 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:50:49 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 20 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1006199448 16718 208.51.139.16 (19 Nov 2001 19:50:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Nov 2001 19:50:49 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service, powerpc-debian-linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:q62noqpVTj8KMzZj9z9+3x+A5Do= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40415 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40415 "Matt Armstrong" writes: > It could be done during a pre-processing run -- if a $secure tag is > found anywhere in the message, delete it and set the "sign" > attribute on all mml tags in the message as appropriate, wrapping > the message in an explicit multipart/mixed tag first if appropriate. Right, but I think you wouldn't need to do explicitly sign each part. Personally, the behavior I'd be looking for would be the automatic wrapping of the whole message with a multipart/mixed part, and then signing that part. I believe this is what mutt does...personally I think the signing/encrypting in mutt is implemented pretty well, so following what they do is a good thing. ttyl, -- Josh Huber