From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/40011 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Using iso-8859-15 with Emacs21 & Gnus Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:27:54 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87hesa6rr9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <877ktg7l35.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87bsim7mw5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <2n1yjio8ug.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <87u1wexktw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <2n7ktaul0k.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <87wv19vuba.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <2nhescyf4t.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <87g07wnnrv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <2nofmjvrb7.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <87snbvha4f.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175629 31018 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:47:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 2778 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2001 06:42:06 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2001 06:42:06 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 160dRG-0008P2-00; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:40:54 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:40:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA10346 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 00:40:18 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 2747 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2001 06:40:32 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 2742 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2001 06:40:31 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2001 06:40:31 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.56 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m160dQo-001X4KC; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:40:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 160WJZ-0008VX-00 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:04:29 +0100 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 160WgE-00015Y-00 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:27:54 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Sun, 04 Nov 2001 19:29:11 +0100") Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40011 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40011 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > After changing Mule to unify the various Latin-* charsets, Emacs does > not distinguish the two variants of =E4 anymore. Not sure what that > means to the whole procedure. Maybe Latin-9 is preferred and used > whenever possible, after set-language-environment? Maybe. If unification is present, the whole MIME charset decision process in Gnus has to be redesigned (and many things can then work in a very straightforward way).