From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27322
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Verifying signatures with Mailcrypt
Date: 29 Nov 1999 16:56:54 -0600
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87hfi4kitl.fsf@ghidra.vail>
References: <87wvr15z1m.fsf@sumo.ozemail.com.au> <vxkr9h99sni.fsf@beaver.jprc.com> <m21z99jetp.fsf@barnowl.demon.co.uk> <19991130091104.A22870@bourbaki.une.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164367 23930 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:39:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20551
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:59:06 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB29708;
	Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:58:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:58:58 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21342
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:58:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from vds01.vailsys.com (root@[207.152.98.19])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20523
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:56:59 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from gator.vail (gator.vail [192.168.128.53])
	by vds01.vailsys.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA02590
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:56:55 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from ghidra.vail (IDENT:postfix@ghidra.vail [192.168.160.15])
	by gator.vail (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA00729
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:56:55 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by ghidra.vail (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DC1BE66AA4; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:56:54 -0600 (CST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: #q^z"Hq<o]"bY|h)h']ZO_al@briUd2A4ZQy:c1}T6&~nT/Fh,6DE'bWyVR{hvK_KsLDd[T
 cd5ml)Q/)yPf<p&8{xvaaS)9D%bo:,\/6ALAH.tiU,~l5J]7IQO[QZU8>zh4a"7N%Y5uL7dCmi9eQn
 N$$?W6sK4H_iL)E{a-n+}Z`'m)`:~Yu7H-H7#fR/3d&X8.Cn9z{N(\J"|Xwy{$kxV]Vud|P!RXTY+0
 (t]!Y}UzO;c+Z
In-Reply-To: David Porter's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:11:04 +1100"
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) XEmacs/21.1 (Biscayne)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27322
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27322

David Porter <dporter@turing.une.edu.au> writes:

> So how are mailcrypt users verifying separate mime signatures?  Saving the
> parts to file and running GPG manually or something?

Pretty much. In XEmacs, view MIME attachment in other buffer and
mc-decrypt or check sig there. Yuck, but I haven't fixed the code yet.
-- 
Hal Snyder
Vail Systems, Inc