From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87984 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andrew Cohen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnir group marks don't propagate? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:21:50 +0800 Organization: Boston University Message-ID: <87in8hl7pt.fsf@ust.hk> References: <87h8o1rbvh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1524538598 23027 195.159.176.226 (24 Apr 2018 02:56:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 02:56:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36198@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Apr 24 04:56:34 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAo8A-0005sc-1i for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 04:56:34 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 6538fa22-476b-11e8-950a-b499baa2b07a; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 02:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1fAo9O-0004jJ-MC; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1fAmej-00040l-0T for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1fAmeh-0005J0-RN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:22:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fAmef-00067W-8Q for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 03:22:01 +0200 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAmcV-0000VK-2j for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 03:19:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZnzNuhbspratSBlKSdoL3Sl/TfY= X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4773 Ham tokens: 0.000-18--674h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-14--523h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-14--519h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-11--416h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-11--416h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus Spam tokens: 0.997-30592--564h-24786s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.997-18645--360h-15119s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18645--360h-15119s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18645--360h-15119s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.995-31560--957h-25869s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4773] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87984 Archived-At: >>>>> "EA" == Eric Abrahamsen writes: EA> Am I hallucinating this, that marks set in an nnir search group EA> used to propagate to the "actual" server group? I could have EA> sworn this worked, as I think it used to be one of my major uses EA> of nnir searches: to "recover" old messages by ticking them or EA> marking them unread. Yes this should definitely work (and has worked for years and years). It is still working in my setup (just checked) but I am using the gnus-select feature branch. The updating should NOT invoke gnus-summary-update-info; the nnir group info list is not saved to the newsrc (unless you are using permanent search groups). The trick is to update the info for the underlying group that the marked messages are from, and this is done elsewhere. Exactly where, err, I would have to go back and look at nnir. Best, Andy