From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87395 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: ignore bcc when followup Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:34:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87ino1hpu1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87y3wy8hd0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9xuc87b.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487799362 16086 195.159.176.226 (22 Feb 2017 21:36:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:36:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m35616@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 22 22:35:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeZm-0003OH-0o for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:35:54 +0100 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id e55ea5be-f946-11e6-b719-b499baa2b07a; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeYz-0002Rg-6B; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:35:05 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeYx-0002R8-NU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:35:03 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeYs-0003dc-Nw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:35:03 -0600 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeYr-0000XT-Ap for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:34:57 +0100 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgeYh-0006Jq-E8 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:34:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 108 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:SYj5/ZHAo5Y10SJGtXP0BGljfac= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87395 Archived-At: >>> "Adam" == Adam Sjøgren writes: > Uwe writes: >> as longer as I think about it: At least optionally the BCC field should >> be ignored in the reply even when calling followup. > Uhm, do you get a Bcc-header when you follow up to an email with a > Bcc-header in it? No. I am saying (see below my experiment.) I receive an email which goes like From: Joe To: John Bcc: Uwe Now I, Uwe hit, by mistake, followup, instead of reply, then they mail looks at it should From: Uwe To: Joe CC: John Which is bad, because John did not know that mail was sent to me. I should have used reply instead of followup, but since a lot of people complained that I hit reply instead of followup, I know hit followup automatically. So my small function will save me such embarrassing situations in the future. Did I explain myself? Below the experiments I did. All can I say I sent an email to myself, with a bcc to another email Here is what I received ,---- | | From: Uwe Brauer | Subject: test bcc | To: Uwe Brauer | Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:26:58 +0000 (1 minute, 5 seconds ago) | Bcc: oub.oub.oub@gmail.com | Reply-To: Uwe Brauer | | adfadf `---- And the other way around ,---- | From: Uwe Brauer | Subject: test 2 | To: Uwe Brauer | Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:27:30 +0000 (48 seconds ago) | Bcc: oub@mat.ucm.es | Reply-To: Uwe Brauer | | This is true `---- > I don't. > (How do you even receive an email with a Bcc header in it? Usually they > aren't sent - what email program sent it?) The email in equation was sent to me from someone using apple mail > I just made an experiment: I sent myself an email, edited it after > receipt, adding a Bcc (and Gcc, just for fun) header, and hit F. > The headers in the follow up that did not include the Bcc (nor the Gcc) > from the email. > Original headers: > From: Adam Sjøgren > Subject: Test > To: Adam Sjøgren > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:51:10 +0100 (1 minute, 24 seconds ago) > Bcc: test@koldfront.dk > Gcc: abba@koldfront.dk > Attachment: [3. text/html]... > Follow up headers: > To: Adam Sjøgren > Subject: Re: Test > From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) > Gcc: nnml+archive:mail-2017 > Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark > OpenPGP: id=476630590A231909B0A0961A49D0746121BDE416; url=https://asjo.koldfront.dk/gpg.asc > X-Now-Playing: Den vänstra stranden, Då som nu för alltid (Kent) > X-Hashcash: 1:21:170222:asjoegren@gmail.com::BVrk/jbmN3tCC90h:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000JJU3 > --text follows this line-- > How did you make Gnus include them? > Best regards, > Adam