From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84637 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: entering a group is slow Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:52:32 +0100 Organization: CPSE, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London (UCL) Message-ID: <87ionx5aen.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> References: <87mwdhmb9y.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87ha3pszqe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2ecj48r.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <877g4g9d5r.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <877g4fgbwb.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87vbrz9a49.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87lhsu3afl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <877g4e7exl.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87wqceuqac.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87oaxqrkze.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87vbrxs5wv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <874mzhs05s.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403182376 3666 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2014 12:52:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:52:56 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32880@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jun 19 14:52:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxbpg-0004lw-NS for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:52:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxbpe-0005d3-BN; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:52:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxbpd-0005cs-7Q for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:52:45 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxbpc-0004ut-4m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:52:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-db3lp0076.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([213.199.154.76] helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WxbpZ-0001Nl-Mt for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:52:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (128.40.74.171) by DB4PR01MB0656.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.141.43.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.24; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:52:34 +0000 X-Url: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucecesf/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <874mzhs05s.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> ("Peter =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster=22's?= message of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:45:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [128.40.74.171] X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR05CA0021.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.40.31) To DB4PR01MB0656.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.141.43.18) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: X-UCLLIVE-SCLRULE: HASRUN X-Forefront-PRVS: 02475B2A01 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(6069001)(428001)(189002)(199002)(24454002)(377424004)(51704005)(77096002)(85306003)(95666004)(46102001)(92566001)(105586002)(31966008)(101416001)(83072002)(76482001)(102836001)(85852003)(79102001)(50466002)(76506005)(77982001)(42186005)(81542001)(4396001)(54356999)(99396002)(86362001)(83322001)(50986999)(76176999)(66066001)(33646001)(92726001)(80022001)(23676002)(64706001)(83506001)(21056001)(47776003)(87976001)(93886003)(20776003)(74482001)(81342001)(74662001)(74502001);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:DB4PR01MB0656;H:localhost;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; Received-SPF: None (: ucl.ac.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk; X-OriginatorOrg: ucl.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84637 Archived-At: On Thursday, 19 Jun 2014 at 11:45, Peter M=C3=BCnster wrote: [...] > I guess elapsed time. But it doesn't matter, because when I do the test, > emacs uses 100% CPU time. Wow! Mine does not, or not noticeably so. The delay, if any, is network latency and the email server, in my case. >> Also, remember that my system has 8 cpu cores and large memory. > > But emacs can only use one core. Sure but if emacs is competing for cpu with anything else, this matters. > Or perhaps I've done something particular, that has made emacs slow? > What could it be...? What about the summary line? Do you have a highly customised one? In my case, the user date function actually contributes non-negligibly to the time gnus takes in preparing the summary buffer... otherwise, I am out of ideas and maybe somebody else can jump in! --=20 : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xFFFCF67D : in Emacs 24.4.50.2 + Ma Gnus v0.12 + evil evil-git-a6a27e0 : BBDB version 3.1.2 (2014-04-27 15:05:20 -0500)