From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84525 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Christensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: should we be able to edit imap messages? Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 19:29:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87iopjhkiq.fsf@uwo.ca> References: <87d2fvwen7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnvffapn.fsf@dod.no> <8738gquvr0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738gqlzat.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399408541 23521 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2014 20:35:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:35:41 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32771@lists.math.uh.edu Tue May 06 22:35:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Whlta-0006CS-JI for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 22:23:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlsW-00083A-GQ; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:22:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlsT-00082t-Mn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:22:13 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlsS-0001A2-55 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:22:13 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhlsQ-0002pP-8R for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 22:22:10 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Whl0L-0000jD-OD for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 21:26:17 +0200 Original-Received: from cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.248.173.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 21:26:17 +0200 Original-Received: from jdc by cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 21:26:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe0023bee5dd21-cm0023bee5dd1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:gIQNUcSk6F69VjjdbID7TB+s4QE= X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84525 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Yeah, but then when you sync the server thinks it has a new message, and > if you're using other clients elsewhere, they all get the "new" message, > and... it just ends up feeling wrong, I think The new message has all of the appropriate flags, so this has never been a problem for me. But the summary buffer usually doesn't update correctly for me, so I need to exit and reenter the group. Dan