From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74666 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnir and non-gmane group detection Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:10:50 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87ipz984fp.fsf@dod.no> References: <87pqthp113.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291507880 509 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2010 00:11:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:11:20 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23022@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Dec 05 01:11:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2CA-0001CU-5x for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2C3-00021P-Lu; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:11:07 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2C2-000218-0F for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:11:06 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2C0-0007d5-MN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:11:05 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PP2Bz-0005qH-00 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:03 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2Bz-00016y-Ie for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:03 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no ([84.208.204.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:03 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:11:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.204.33.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9uu/G5SYY6x6/LdJt0VGfYpqecg= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74666 Archived-At: >>>>> Tibor Simko : > The above bit makes nnir think my gmane groups are actually non-gmane. > Note that I'm using: > (nntp "gmane" (nntp-address "news.gmane.org")) > in `gnus-secondary-select-methods'. > It would be good to make the test less strict again and/or more > configurable. If the test checked that the backend was nntp and then checked if nntp-address contains gmane.org, then that should be robust enough to handle all gmane backend configurations?