Re: SPAM in spam group is processed into that exact same group

[Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>]

Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org> writes:

Hi again,

> But I still have a hard time marking false positives in "INBOX.Junk
> Mail", because it seems new mail in that group is not automatically
> marked as spam.  But I have
>
>   (setq gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents
>       '(("\\(spam\\|Junk\\)" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)))
>
> which says that new messages would be marked according the
> classification on summary entry.  That seems to work fine for the group
>
>   nnimap+Uni:Junk
>
> but not for
>
>   nnimap+Fastmail:INBOX.Junk Mail
>
> although the regexp matches both.

That statement seems to be false.  At least right now, I had 5 new mails
in "INBOX.Junk Mail" and all were marked as spam.  But one was a false
positive, which I've read to be sure using RET on it.  Then I deleted
the spam mark using M-u (which also made it unread, right?).  Hitting
RET again didn't mark it read again, so I had to exit the summary,
*Group* showed one unread article, reenter the group, read the false
positive, exit the summary again, and then the article copying/moving
was done.

So it seems I'm operating it not as intended... Oh, now I found out what
to do: Simply mark as read not by actually reading the article but with
`d'. :-)

Bye,
Tassilo