From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73827 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: SPAM in spam group is processed into that exact same group Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:16:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87iq0d4i7u.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87ocan4cis.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87tykbj4of.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87iq0q3xzx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tykaf37y.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87fwvu2f9m.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w1lxwnm.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <874oc8zzqp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874oc8ua5o.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87tyk8x03w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwvsis21.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871v7bmt8w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aalqnyxz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288858641 9098 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2010 08:17:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22196@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 04 09:17:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDv0X-0005cA-AA for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:17:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PDuzY-0000Nz-Ve; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PDuzV-0000Ng-Hs for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PDuzS-00050q-HI for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PDuzR-0004yq-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:16:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FB1780152E; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:16:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24012-02; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:16:07 +0100 (CET) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender noch tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (tsdh.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.67.142]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62B57801525; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:16:07 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87aalqnyxz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:39:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73827 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: Hi again, > But I still have a hard time marking false positives in "INBOX.Junk > Mail", because it seems new mail in that group is not automatically > marked as spam. But I have > > (setq gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents > '(("\\(spam\\|Junk\\)" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam))) > > which says that new messages would be marked according the > classification on summary entry. That seems to work fine for the group > > nnimap+Uni:Junk > > but not for > > nnimap+Fastmail:INBOX.Junk Mail > > although the regexp matches both. That statement seems to be false. At least right now, I had 5 new mails in "INBOX.Junk Mail" and all were marked as spam. But one was a false positive, which I've read to be sure using RET on it. Then I deleted the spam mark using M-u (which also made it unread, right?). Hitting RET again didn't mark it read again, so I had to exit the summary, *Group* showed one unread article, reenter the group, read the false positive, exit the summary again, and then the article copying/moving was done. So it seems I'm operating it not as intended... Oh, now I found out what to do: Simply mark as read not by actually reading the article but with `d'. :-) Bye, Tassilo