From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72196 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap splitting Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:31:53 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87iq1oxuxy.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87fwww1bht.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y6al1y4k.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285785137 29958 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2010 18:32:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20569@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 29 20:32:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P11Rt-0004YE-PT for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:32:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P11Rs-0003p9-F4; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:32:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P11Rq-0003ou-Ms for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P11Rm-0002Wy-Sr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P11Rm-0005Th-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:32:06 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P11Ri-0004Um-B5 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:32:02 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:32:02 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:32:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lbQzlk0GILuQ6m+GAFSZAcJ+BBE= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72196 Archived-At: On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:24:27 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I don't see anything about `nnimap-inbox' in the manual, only a mention >> in the news file. LMI> It's in the "Client-Side IMAP Splitting" node. Ah damn it. `ack' without "-a" doesn't grep texi files, apparently. Sorry. >> IMO `nnimap-inbox' should default to "INBOX" instead of nil since >> that's always available on an IMAP server and splitting is enabled >> only if `nnimap-split-methods' is set. So it's harmless to set it to >> "INBOX". LMI> Yes, but for the development version I wanted to keep it safer than LMI> safe. When all problems have been ironed out, then we can flip the LMI> default. OK, I understand. >> I noticed that the `nnimap-split-rule' is no longer consulted. LMI> nnimap uses the normal split methods now. Should we declare it obsolete then, so users that have customized it are not surprised? Ted