From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71911 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87iq1ss0ep.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87mxr4s1oj.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285533718 23084 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2010 20:41:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20284@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 26 22:41:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozy2n-0001b8-BG for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozy2m-0002LK-9y; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:41:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozy2k-0002Kx-Bh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozy2i-0007nv-Gg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ozy2h-00055F-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:51 +0200 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 66AA65C0F4; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7350E5C0B3 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozy2A-0006lg-RG for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:18 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:27:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71911 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 26 2010, Robert Pluim wrote: > My description of the behaviour was incomplete: when it happens, there > will often be many unread articles higher in the summary (I sometimes > end up in the middle of an unread thread), plus if I exit the group and > re-enter it I'll usually end up somewhere different, so I don't think > it's gnus-auto-select-subject. I still think it is. The default was unread, and now it'ss unseen-or-unread, which makes Gnus goes to the first unseen, and not unread. Am I still wrong? :) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyfr+4ACgkQpGK1HsL+5c2E1wCbBmkmYTVEFqimZk60imY92Lol qLAAnjrHwGGGjH3nvXlxd4Mup3aSoq7M =4mYN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--