From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32716 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Fuchs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: 'F' in nnml group sending news? Date: 03 Oct 2000 22:00:12 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87itr91yr7.fsf@dahaIM.dyndns.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168953 21341 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:55:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4C7D051E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:01:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAC01527; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:00:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:00:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22396 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:00:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from dahaIM.dyndns.org (csvr3203.noe-online.at [194.106.234.203]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBBED051E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:00:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by dahaIM.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D40422F6E9; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32716 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32716 Today, Laura Conrad wrote: > This is true only in that particular group; in my other nnml groups 'F' > behaves as I expect it to. I can't think of anything that makes that > group different from some of the groups that aren't broken. 'R' works > the way I expect it to. Could it be that this one special group is a virtual group? In that case, it often consists of two or more groups. How could gnus then know to which group/address it should send the follow-up? regards, -- Andreas Stefan Fuchs in Real Life aka asf@acm.org, asfuchs@gmx.at, asf@ycom.at in NNTP and SMTP, antifuchs in IRCNet and Relf Herbstfresser, Male 1/2 Elf Priest in AD&D