From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29605 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Vaughan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap and Courier imapd Date: 21 Mar 2000 09:15:33 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87itygtfbe.fsf@rehab.in.aventail.com> References: <87r9dkuwub.fsf@roka.net> <87ln3ee6kh.fsf@rehab.in.aventail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166249 3666 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:10:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Marc Packenius , michael@freenet-ag.de Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1BAD051E for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 12:16:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB20339; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:16:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:15:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05758 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:15:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from newman.aventail.com (newman.aventail.com [216.207.80.10]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0BED051E for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 12:15:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from leo.in.aventail.com (leo.in.aventail.com [192.168.1.136]) by newman.aventail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA27917; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:15:37 -0800 Original-Received: from rehab.in.aventail.com ([192.168.100.31]) by leo.in.aventail.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id HKGV5F89; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:18:26 -0800 Original-Received: from tom by rehab.in.aventail.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12XSFl-0008Q1-00; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:15:37 -0800 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Tom Vaughan's message of "19 Mar 2000 18:09:02 -0800" Original-Lines: 70 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29605 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29605 Tom Vaughan writes: > I was just about to file exactly this same report. I've been able to = access > the Courier imap server with IMP just fine. I've put up an imap-debug at: http://vaughan.to/tom/pub/imap-debug.gz if anyone is interested. If there is any other information that's neede= d, please let me know. I can even setup a shell acct. on the smtp/imap ser= ver if need be. Thanks much.=20 -Tom >=20 > -Tom >=20 > Marc Packenius writes: >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > We're trying to make our IMAPd and IMAP-proxies work with nnimap, a= s of yet > > without success though. > >=20 > > It seems I can login and get an overview of the messages (which is = displayed > > in the Group buffer as count for unread and "all" messages), but wh= en I try > > to access one of the mails, I run into problems. > >=20 > > This is what I see: > >=20 > > Starting gnus, the imap folder (nnimap+imap.freenet.de:inbox) dis= plays a > > correct message count. The counts for new messages and all messag= es in > > the Group buffer are correct (e.g. 1/12). > >=20 > > Whenever I try to enter the group, the number of new messages is = set to 0 > > (e.g. 0/12) in the Group buffer and Gnus displays "No unread news= ". If > > the count for new articles was 0, Gnus displays "No articles in t= he > > group". > >=20 > > We've compared the output from MS Exchange's imap server and from o= ur > > imapd. The author of the imapd server ("Courier imapd") states: > >=20 > > > Both of these responses appear to be perfectly correct. The diffe= rences > > > are completely superficial. > >=20 > > Now we're lost. The problem doesn't seem to be with our imapd proxy= (which > > doesn't modify the data), nor with the imapd server we're using. I'm > > including an Ethereal dump of what happens when I try to access the= nnimap > > folder. > >=20 > > Perhaps someone can point out where the problem lies? Please copy m= e on > > your response; I'm following the ding list, but not as close as I w= ould > > like to... > >=20 > > Thanks! > >=20 > > --=20 > > Marc Packenius, QA > > freenet.de AG, Entwicklungszentrum D=FCsseldorf > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Tom Vaughan >=20 --=20 Tom Vaughan