From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22424 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: void function make-annotation Date: 13 Apr 1999 09:00:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87iub1ypgq.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160346 29242 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:32:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA10246 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 03:05:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB09592; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:01:34 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:01:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA29510 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:01:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA10231 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 03:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 10WxBW-0005Kj-00; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:00:38 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > Ok; then we should check something else to see whether xbms can be > displayed. > > (featurep 'xbm) > => nil > > even if XEmacs can do xbms, so what is the proper test? What XEmacs is that? (featurep 'xbm) evaluates to t for me. You could do (featurep 'x), but XBMs can also be displayed in lateish MS Windows XEmacsen. I'm not sure if it's possible to compile XEmacs without XBM support, but with X support. If not, then this might be the correct test: (or (featurep 'x) (featurep 'xbm)) Oh yes, you could also test it with this: (valid-image-instantiator-format-p 'xbm) ...which should reliably return t on all XEmacsen able to display an XBM.