From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ding-owner+M39720=ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.math.uh.edu>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (mx1.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.32])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFCD240B9
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 09:36:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M39720=ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1riViR-0000000BVri-2Uj2
	for ml@inbox.vuxu.org;
	Fri, 08 Mar 2024 02:36:31 -0600
Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M39720=ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1riViR-00000001dYT-1TuR
	for ml@inbox.vuxu.org;
	Fri, 08 Mar 2024 02:36:31 -0600
Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <kuba@kubajecminek.cz>)
	id 1riViN-00000001dYK-0HyU
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu;
	Fri, 08 Mar 2024 02:36:28 -0600
Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.97.1)
	(envelope-from <kuba@kubajecminek.cz>)
	id 1riViD-00000007wxO-2uXC
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu;
	Fri, 08 Mar 2024 02:36:26 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org;
	 s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID
	:Subject:Cc:From:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:
	Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:
	In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
	List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=MjU8kmm3SqV6VfCSVNN0t98j5wt33QOp8q3VOaXpS5g=; b=nb70ZItJ/5qEsyWeRx0CSWOQ3U
	1F2sl7t/Pz+JplNKqn1Ggr53cR0gbEw1/9bsabR1lwxIe0NNaotg+oAr6XxgLVD0jcTauZ0Sx4ZVJ
	no+R3bdF1fha/fBLRDv1QgT0LcuNIR8Jtwp04Cknzu9SSHUUoQJsohqUgRZR+hFdRNyQ=;
Received: from mail-40136.proton.ch ([185.70.40.136])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <kuba@kubajecminek.cz>)
	id 1riVi3-0007rg-TC
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:36:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kubajecminek.cz;
	s=protonmail; t=1709886965; x=1710146165;
	bh=MjU8kmm3SqV6VfCSVNN0t98j5wt33QOp8q3VOaXpS5g=;
	h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:
	 Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
	b=JmQ5s311H8fPIq3HNwrCWOODIhz6gUH3B548qw3PIseWJHfHzal3TlRxj5mrxlp7A
	 Wyq8iBDCZK5uD1F+XdODEwZ6SPfgfqb2THPkpj8WCdI2aAUS+4T2qO9BRe3sh+LQy/
	 aK7KTwg6KjNGcRqTJBq0sAxXG6aqwq1skJ57Qi8yhintduuwjKWc6n2g5SC2VHfLo1
	 GEaDTGTyunXjqMTysOdKuvIGFYQmHElsZLDLlW/jhpk5PXAR7ruZkqA0dP52iHAeRO
	 5ODYbk0R0J6xs86hxo0pHqwGbKlCKNN3zL2fgG0AyR+e+DwD8/T1fu7UfPvfCqMOXW
	 66NSxzEa5ZNhA==
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:35:54 +0000
To: ding@gnus.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Jakub_Je=C4=8Dm=C3=ADnek?= <kuba@kubajecminek.cz>
Cc: Husain Alshehhi <husain@alshehhi.io>
Subject: Re: Advanced Scoring Syntax with "To" and "Cc" Headers
Message-ID: <87jzmd15p4.fsf@kubajecminek.cz>
Feedback-ID: 98803324:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk

> Thank you. This seems to be working.

Glad it worked.

> But performance is the main reason I use "extra" for CC and To (after
> setting gnus-extra-headers). Is there an equivalent syntax for using
> "extra" matcher?

It seems that you cannot use `extra' match in advanced scoring at
all (see `gnus-advanced-index' variable).

--=20
Kuba Je=C4=8Dm=C3=ADnek (http://kubajecminek.cz)