From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12930 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2023 14:02:31 -0000 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.33) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Nov 2023 14:02:31 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mf0-00EWlo-1P for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:02:30 -0600 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mf0-000py7-0R for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:02:30 -0600 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mey-000py0-1i for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:02:28 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mew-00EO2z-2f for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:02:28 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nZ5vdmewvC4bvKMmTcCT20GCJfcZ8eUM9dr89JACf9Q=; b=A0CYJ8VxZ10N6dc68NfytvuHH0 nLYIHE1sqTU3aP7d3Ceadvr7N8AZiMPfiH/S5mfzGUwlOHIYuZ7TGADp9YXiiIQoA6psbV7WqsPWJ rY1FsCYcbks6hOQWwTXR2ib4rHOhm5OrG/AX3KT/pT3vWMkdN/66wX4U4mT77EYB2868=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mce-0008Nc-SE for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 15:00:07 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Mce-00039s-3Y for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 15:00:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: resending bounces: DKIM and Message-ID: Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:59:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzqtk6jn.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87msvu8m4w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877cmw80c4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lebal401.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:syp9wEa8Ug11y1SEiENo06E0Umk= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Greg Troxel wrote: > Sure, but it is not mandatory to use aliases, and someone > typing an email address in To: or CC: is not contrary to > documentation. So I don't think we can say "the bounce > resend function should never allow editing because the user > should never had made a mistake". That would be an interesting software philosophy. > For me, bounces because I mistype are not that common. Okay, glad to hear it! But yes, actually it sounded that way. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal