From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29087 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2020 18:49:40 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Nov 2020 18:49:40 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXu-005c5Y-N0; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:48:10 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXs-00BTyc-BD; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:48:08 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXo-00BTwq-FT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:48:04 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXm-00CCrR-Nw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:48:04 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7/Q23VBV4xyAthpvSgmYHksyBepASZvr1l5xXsYbWqk=; b=ixdi8RpO5XnIvUWxcxnJTFOelZ VPj9pGiREygmNwshFCx+8DUEBIh8iOfNmBmsTc5+ylnMBAkpE54PNNy6SA+5r4O4Edyy9Ge55jn59 pABG3S/DY0dcy2LTevCDyyRLxX3gyJgjxknN3QrPz09TS6pTF9FoAcMEladNQuex6rV4=; Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214] helo=ciao.gmane.io) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXe-0003E7-Px for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:47:58 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kejXe-0001py-00 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:47:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: New "gnus-search" syntax and interface Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:47:49 -0800 Message-ID: <87k0ul2l62.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87blgdavsb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877dqpikh5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sg9dctwu.fsf@hillenius.net> <87tuttfm20.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ft5dgrm6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87361djiui.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <877dqpgoky.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pn4hc97h.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <871rgtgxcn.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6fAMKBDwO658pQThe3RxFOHQPQg= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric S Fraga writes: > On Friday, 13 Nov 2020 at 20:06, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: >> This sounds suspiciously similar to a problem i had to overcome trying >> to use gnus-search-notmuch in a slightly different context: the search >> for groups in the results was using the group names using dots instead >> of slashes. > > Your advice code did the job! Thank you. Search is now working as it > should. Well that's pretty weird. I didn't think I changed any of the actual parsing behavior, only reorganized code. I'll do a more careful comparison of the original nnir code and the new gnus-search stuff, and see what happened. You shouldn't have to advise anything just to get it basically functioning.