From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88671
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnimap-get-groups: %NoSelect vs. %Noselect
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:27:55 -0700
Message-ID: <87k1ce6ijo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
References: <875zo14cuo.fsf@dick.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87o91r2kyn.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87woge6suz.fsf@mouse.gnus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="91833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M36875@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jul 19 19:28:52 2019
Return-path: <ding-owner+M36875@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M36875@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1hoWgc-000Nj0-Ot
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:28:50 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M36875@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1hoWg2-0005Wq-FB; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:28:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1hoWfx-0005U4-NS
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:28:09 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1hoWfv-0001v1-HJ
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:28:09 -0500
Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226] helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1hoWfq-0002WD-7w
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:28:05 +0200
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1hoWfp-000Mpa-2s
	for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:28:01 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yyGFd0JtJR3/XBHRWMDS7bvnhkM=
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:88671
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/88671>

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
>> dick <dick.r.chiang@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Dovecot capitalizes the no-select flag as "%Noselect" when nnimap-get-groups
>>> expects "%NoSelect".  My internal fix was to lowercase-normalize all the
>>> flags and then match on "%noselect".
>>
>> Looks like the RFCs also have %Noselect, so I expect we're just doing it
>> wrong here. I never noticed as all my Noselect groups don't actually
>> exist (they only hold children), so they were getting filtered out
>> later.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any servers that use %NoSelect? Looks like this
>> should be a straight fix, otherwise.
>
> Yup.  I have no recollection of \NoSelect, and the server I was using
> for testing at that time was Dovecot...  is it possible that they
> released a version that had \NoSelect at some point?

Beats me. Maybe someone else will chime in.

> But it's probably just a typo on my part.

I'm inclined to just switch it, but we could also check for both, just
to be safe.