From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87399 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: SOLVED Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:46:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87k28hfiyf.fsf@randomsample.de> References: <87y3wy8hd0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9xu6nz0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487836043 13649 195.159.176.226 (23 Feb 2017 07:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:47:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m35620@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 23 08:47:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo7P-0002q4-4w for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:47:15 +0100 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4ca890c9-f99c-11e6-b156-b499baabecb2; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo6d-00078w-0N; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 01:46:27 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo6a-00078H-4A for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 01:46:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo6Y-0007Mr-Eb for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 01:46:24 -0600 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo6V-0008IO-NC for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:46:19 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=BlhjMADwoqgPhp5rBkFvU3PTQ7KEg1/J3HKmwcweoxg=; b=AhZLCzzva3RdXqJGrleyalgmIS/ri4Slh7u87qzpE38Dyn8T1FjtRXlbBxpW8lJhGQmWET4zsDcvhAz7KwzJpLxOJQ9fDUd1DJiRY59mE09JLiFPFW5toxCbsnGmjtLK; Original-Received: from ip4d16b353.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.179.83] helo=isaac) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cgo6U-00020y-I3 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:46:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o9xu6nz0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:10:27 +0000") List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87399 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: >>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Brauer writes: > > > Hi > > as longer as I think about it: At least optionally the BCC field should > > be ignored in the reply even when calling followup. > > > I look into the code, looks difficult to modify. Any ideas? > > > Regards > > > Uwe Brauer > > > The following code does this Be warned that this will not always work. The handling of Bcc is a chaos and depends on the involved MUAs and MTAs. Some MTAs completely strip the Bcc field, some don't. Some MUAs send a separate mail for the people in the Bcc, so that at least they cannot do a reply all. The best solution is to simply tell everyone to not use Bcc, but to do separate mails instead, even if it is cumbersome. What would be a good feature for Gnus is to better highlight if you received this mail via To, CC or none of the above (like mailing lists or Bcc). What actually happens quite often at my day job is that I merge review requests that were only sent to me via CC... -David