From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87047 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outlook rejecting messages because not RFC 5322 Compliant Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:24:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2iu9omz.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> References: <57379ba7.2a138c0a.aa341.01ac@mx.google.com> <87oa86z542.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87a8jqw7o4.fsf@gmail.com> <8760ueyzpg.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463416858 28069 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 16:40:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:40:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35268@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 16 18:40:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2LZE-000579-L2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:40:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2LYS-0001Jd-5d; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2HZm-0007ij-VT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:24:47 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2HZl-0002zA-90 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:24:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1b2HZj-0004EW-Q9 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:24:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain ([79.224.38.149]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1Wcz-1bqWqa3Cyf-00tWdx for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:24:37 +0200 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2B5A3F295; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:24:36 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <8760ueyzpg.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> ("Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren=22's?= message of "Mon, 16 May 2016 14:06:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/C02ok+rDeySlNOUpPkbVLVnQKAMwzeqA3XqhH6nGmJcbVsqrKY 442OgR02WHRRWZaErfKRLAYsYpWYkAGHZcgZNEvTMvDUpmOhuum8Q9QtJLoZRr7ShoXPnNM F4/KCIF0JTSuSyu0VR44CiuaDwIM7JPG40shlgns28xK6USG+3txjRCNyHG+OTdTYMgOExE sOTHBJb7UCNjVO2NbJdLA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:3zQ0n3B+9QU=:uc1KtCytxNfzW9idmbY/Xr 0o/+o+lFOwBEhWGHXdzFrUs2dWV8BGoFp5fEmoj7X3MP5CupyqQkHadN1eTojDWBdI5yRpbBz 4j32JqJOePPX7efhFrJqiuwc/SdD4bAS5AbNBT55Ld7bWJbiWPCOb1f4ROMLTXGjLNTz5eO3E hcG0H//2TUhAa3Qj+4+ZrMS09vzFTt+/dL5wXDvJWgYYvSafvIj/wj/QaI7W9UYZ27EzZHosE HxtlFdjNolLX/8zTe7LORI4ZHDP3AJGTO1CcSL4S1/Rx16KXTRu7fLXtOQdCNM7DtkodcFIQl zgqsslFHdv+xYOPGSH0UhvVTO/OzXdLGz0fkYMb9BjtpfR7n38nZnHV+JJWnZLE+oyjd7JS58 tFBBxp+BI7fmUuYNlTVVuQ8Wi8pMYSuMkBLkqizlLkTP3fvu/pMvn8Nc4KLlMfwslIcdKRBQ4 Ve4wtmw08gFFOKee7qH32OG8+SHj6eaYEuyaq2BBveyV9EoLz6eERQr3HdIbYJuac1i56bde7 ZHuakGW4B3GvIG7dXe5ixIDEyWDUlK3y3NdEQbo6UU4Vf7z+sX7viXcSGHccMcXGYhcK/tzM7 3JIHmqRQ0eAI5licdLiwVjLctXbug4hr9twvToyts7iyj3ixZey/6StR7cQjMX9fZKuGDI9wV pUX+J+J9bPJiJNiP+2IwTQ6GolhvF6fYYHTc0Ap1DJJAIVu4AOcnLu80ZgAVK6iWnIxWSV87f O6HJvSdGHs0JoNhc1j3JA7R61ym46zx3AWdzFXyn668SmW+fCIdHhhTLThjXSgzePJaR2lkq X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87047 Archived-At: On 2016-05-16 14:06 +0200, Adam Sj=C3=B8gren wrote: > Halim. writes: > >> From: mail@host.com (John, Miller) > > Maybe the punctuation within the name confuses Microsoft Exchange... > > (I'm too lazy to check the RFCs, but I would expect that Gnus generates > compliant headers...) Well, the =E2=80=98parens=E2=80=99 message-from-style seems to be discourag= ed in RFC 5322 section 3.4: ,---- | Note: Some legacy implementations used the simple form where the | addr-spec appears without the angle brackets, but included the | name of the recipient in parentheses as a comment following the | addr-spec. Since the meaning of the information in a comment is | unspecified, implementations SHOULD use the full name-addr form of | the mailbox, instead of the legacy form, to specify the display | name associated with a mailbox. Also, because some legacy | implementations interpret the comment, comments generally SHOULD | NOT be used in address fields to avoid confusing such | implementations. `---- Cheers, Sven