From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86847 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: duplicates with offlineimap+dovecot Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:52:36 +1100 Message-ID: <87k2m9ksp7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <878u34uyk4.fsf@free.fr> <84bn7q9m9i.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87wpqd5u46.fsf@gnus.org> <87si11nz3m.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87r3glp923.fsf@gnus.org> <87io1wfbvp.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> <87pow4dsqf.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455346410 30326 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 06:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: gallego@cri.ensmp.fr (Emilio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Gallego Arias) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35070@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 13 07:53:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4z-0000li-5U for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:53:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4w-0006uy-Hm; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:53:14 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4u-0006uI-7J for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:53:12 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4s-0007vN-6Q for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:53:12 -0600 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4q-0005bE-NJ for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:53:08 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aUU4P-0001ew-Ls; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:52:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pow4dsqf.fsf@cri.ensmp.fr> ("Emilio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Gallego Arias"'s message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:56:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aUU4P-0001ew-Ls MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455951164.48701@00z6v6pFo1yIy2X39bLfyw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86847 Archived-At: gallego@cri.ensmp.fr (Emilio Jes=3FFFFAs Gallego Arias) writes: > gallego@cri.ensmp.fr (Emilio Jes=3FFFFAs Gallego Arias) writes: > >> --- *nnimap domain buf ** >> * OK [COPYUID 1424475206 4065 96] Moved UIDs. >> * VANISHED 4065 >> * 10 RECENT >> 9018 OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 5192] Move completed. >> * OK [COPYUID 1424475218 4062,4066,4068 376:378] Moved UIDs. >> * OK [COPYUID 1424475231 4063:4064,4067,4069:4072 26:32] Moved UIDs. >> * VANISHED 4062,4066,4068:4072 >> * 3 RECENT >> 9019 OK Move completed. >> 9020 OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 5193] Move completed. >> >> I'm really puzzled by this log, dunno how to interpret it. I think that it says "I did everything you asked". So if these messages remain in the original folder after the server says "Move completed", then there's something wrong with that server... > Yeah so the only idea that came to my mind is if the pipelining of UID > MOVEs could be causing some problem... Pipelining is something that all IMAP servers should handle without too much problem. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no