From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85545 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Snoozing a message in gnus? Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:53:45 +0800 Message-ID: <87k309t2dy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87y4oqi2it.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87egqhdosa.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422323255 27100 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2015 01:47:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 01:47:35 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33787@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 27 02:47:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFd-0003bE-0j for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:47:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFb-000885-5w; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:47:31 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFa-00087s-38 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:47:30 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFV-0001Ey-RR for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:47:29 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFT-00087n-QV for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:47:23 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFvFQ-0003OZ-Dm for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from 221.218.165.215 ([221.218.165.215]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from eric by 221.218.165.215 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:47:20 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.218.165.215 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NJKqJrIEI3xLatflITPpkNai/K4= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.0 2014-02-07) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-6--301h-0s--0d--D*de, 0.000-4--217h-0s--0d--writes, 0.000-4--204h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-4--200h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-4--200h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs Spam tokens: 0.994-1615--55h-845s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.993-1685--64h-885s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-1685--64h-885s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-1680--69h-885s--0d--H*RT:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-1680--69h-885s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85545 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> Interesting - didn't know the `?' command. >> >> If one now could supply a time at which the mail should be un-marked as >> being dormant... > > The dormant list doesn't store the time the message was made dormant, > but I guess one could store that information somewhere. If somebody > wanted to implement this. :-) Ted mentioned the registry...