From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82839 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Agent in batch mode for imap Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:38:53 +1030 Message-ID: <87k3rfpgcq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87623dfh85.fsf@free.fr> <87r4m1j9ii.fsf@free.fr> <877gnshm9e.fsf@gmail.com> <877gng5bry.fsf@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358201380 4666 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2013 22:09:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:09:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31105@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jan 14 23:09:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TusE9-0005bd-HV for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:09:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TusCh-0002wF-Lg; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:08:27 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TusCf-0002vs-GN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:08:25 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TusCd-0000ER-1z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:08:24 -0600 Original-Received: from co1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.184] helo=co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TusCZ-0006D3-Sq for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:08:20 +0100 Original-Received: from mail71-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.202) by CO1EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.243.66.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:11 +0000 Original-Received: from mail71-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6731B401A2 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.254.245;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:DB3PRD0111HT003.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: PS-1(zzbb2dIc89bh1432Izz1ee6h1de0h1d18h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzzz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3h93fhd24he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h16a6h1758hbe9i1155h) Original-Received: from mail71-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1358201289913004_23445; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from CO1EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.201]) by mail71-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1EEB8004C for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from DB3PRD0111HT003.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (157.56.254.245) by CO1EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (10.243.66.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost (202.158.216.33) by pod51002.outlook.com (10.255.186.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.257.4; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:08:05 +0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <877gng5bry.fsf@free.fr> (Julien Cubizolles's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:55:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [202.158.216.33] X-UCLLIVE-SCLRULE: HASRUN X-OriginatorOrg: ucl.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82839 Archived-At: Julien Cubizolles writes: =20 [...]=20 =20 > - imap with splitting + gnus-agent=C2=A0: every unread mail on the=20 > server=20 > gets a duplicate in the Summary buffer every time the agent=20 > fetchs when gnus runs unplugged. This duplicate disappears=20 > with C-g in the Summary buffer when running gnus plugged.=20 >=20=20 > Is there a reason why splitting shouldn't be used when agent=20 > fetching=C2=A0? Are some of you successfully using the agent in this=20 > manner=C2=A0?=20 I use gnus + agent + splitting with no problem. The only=20 difference I can see between what you are doing and what I do is=20 that the final destination in the split rules, in my case, is=20 *not* INBOX but another group ("general", in my case). Maybe=20 there is some confusion about splitting from INBOX into INBOX when=20 the agent comes into play? HTH, eric --=20 : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D : in Emacs 24.3.50.1 + Ma Gnus v0.6 : BBDB version 3.02 ($Date: 2013/01/13 22:41:36 $)