From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80328 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: smtp crap Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:16:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87k48anvll.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739f4kzp3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ipo0p1bc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <58C87CB9F44943A7BBE78F2D6B62A850@us.oracle.com> <83botsf06d.fsf@gnu.org> <83k48cxj85.fsf@gnu.org> <87aa97nghb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318429024 24744 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2011 14:17:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , joakim@verona.se, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , larsi@gnus.org, Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 16:16:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzcA-0006TR-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:16:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzc9-00023o-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzc6-0001yd-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzc5-0003Cv-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:39863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzc2-0003Cf-RP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so739560vcb.0 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=eabI20VCTeK8+Lr687zBQnYt7okxGshRkojRQxWtVLU=; b=iohlXEA2FQcN1diQ0F6fXTCxhoWHd2u4asfDNAE8Y8c8W4R+/f7xcog4KLahi0hPeB y/nW7c2yJNAdtA+QSNk023VlGY0XichEnb29c6/c5LB1peoDJNvzLTIbkBeJgfmdIeDQ moZ03AkgW7BI9ymfFG2nGDmnRsu490t19ONZs= Original-Received: by 10.68.13.35 with SMTP id e3mr1631631pbc.31.1318429009320; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.75.116.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ji3sm444612pbc.2.2011.10.12.07.16.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98CBA285F; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:16:38 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:12:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145007 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80328 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 08:33, wrote: > > If you are using for example Gmail as a webmail there is a utility you > can install to make it the default MUA on your pc. > > And there are also add-ons for different browsers to make > mailto:-links work with different webmails. (I think I suggested long > ago to make Emacs bug reporter write a html page to take advantage of > this.) What benefits would writing a web page bring compared to the current mailclient implementation?