From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79759 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Johnny Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Citing text tutorials and practices? Supercite? Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:19:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87k49yu386.fsf@DeuxExMachina.config> References: <8762lix033.fsf@DeuxExMachina.config> <87zkiuu4ju.fsf@DeuxExMachina.config> <87vctiu1b7.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314473063 20300 80.91.229.12 (27 Aug 2011 19:24:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:24:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28053@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Aug 27 21:24:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxOUN-0006Ov-Ls for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:24:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QxOU1-0004Vo-Uf; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:23:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QxOU0-0004Vd-Ef for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QxOTz-0002vB-IY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com ([213.165.64.43]) by quimby.gnus.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QxOTx-0001NT-Uk for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:23:54 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2011 19:23:48 -0000 Original-Received: from 78-86-131-176.zone2.bethere.co.uk (EHLO DeuxExMachina.config) [78.86.131.176] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu005) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2011 21:23:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #57368918 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX193R2J281t373BsFJm7jdzBa2EKE/crBUjdkcBiNj N8OFBYWdB3H7G9 In-Reply-To: <87vctiu1b7.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam =?utf-8?Q?Sj?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B8gren=22's?= message of "Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:00:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79759 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > I use still use SuperCite - can't really say why, though. I seem to > remember that it handled filling nested citations better at one point, > but I'm not sure. > > See also: http://koldfront.dk/archive/2010/09/07-201222.html :-) Ok, that configuration improves the look to get closer to Gnus default citing style, but slightly more noisy in comparing. I noticed e.g. Supercite does not cite empty lines, but Gnus does. For the time, I'll keep to Gnus default and boxquote, but keep the commented supercite config in case I get compelled/convinced to do a switch in the future. Thanks! --=20 Johnny