From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78399 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus automatic builds Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:50 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87k4f7mclt.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762qs3swu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r59fr05z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp0jpcl2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcyr5jzt.fsf@randomsample.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302116352 26994 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 18:59:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:59:12 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26702@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 06 20:59:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7XwX-0005Sk-4N for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:59:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Xw5-0003Vn-7t; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Xw3-0003Vh-RU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Xw3-00006w-Ix for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from chirelay1o.jumptrading.com ([38.98.147.153] helo=chirelay1.jumptrading.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Xw1-0005F6-M4 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:58:33 +0200 Original-Received: from chirelay1.jumptrading.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by chirelay1.jumptrading.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 6065F32002F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:27 -0500 (CDT) X-AuditID: 26629395-9e27abb0000024ac-04-4d9cb7d3fa92 Original-Received: from chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.140]) by chirelay1.jumptrading.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 48F292DC00A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.29) by chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.291.1; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:51 -0500 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com ([10.2.14.81]) by internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:51 -0500 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: <87vcyr5jzt.fsf@randomsample.de> (David Engster's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:10:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2011 18:57:51.0178 (UTC) FILETIME=[873E0AA0:01CBF48C] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78399 Archived-At: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:10:14 +0200 David Engster wrote: DE> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:14:43 +0200 David Engster wrote: >> DE> OK, I've done that now. When invoking the rule 'fail-on-warning', the DE> build will be marked as failed for compile errors, and the most DE> important warnings are reported as errors as well. dgnushack will still DE> continue compiling, but in the end the build will be marked as failed. >> DE> The following warnings are currently enabled in dgnushack: >> DE> '(free-vars unresolved callargs redefine suspicious) >> DE> All other warnings will be ignored. If you want to see those, do 'make DE> warn' in the lisp subdirectory. >> >> Wonderful. Can we set up a separate `make warn' build to go to just the >> Gnus developers individually, not the Ding mailing list? DE> As for 'make warn', I don't think it makes much sense to have a failed DE> builds for those warnings. There are simply too many (just try it). OK. I'm OK with just the blamelist for failed builds, though I would always add Katsumi Yamaoka, Lars, and me to it. >> Also does it run the ERT tests? I think it should, maybe as a separate >> target. The registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests write files to >> the filesystem (using `make-temp-file') but otherwise there are no side >> effects. DE> Not yet. I think we should use another Makefile rule for that. I'll see DE> to it that I add something, probably 'make check', which will then DE> depend on many smaller rules which run specific tests (like the registry DE> tests). Up to you, however you want to do it. Ted