From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76366 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "no process" gnus bug when moving messages from nnml to imap folder Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:14:18 -0800 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: <87k4hfsjcl.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8762t1dww9.fsf@gnus.org> <871v3orhhw.fsf@gnus.org> <87k4hgq1du.fsf@gnus.org> <83d3n8b3dq.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp2skwok.fsf@gnus.org> <8762szisoq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oc6r3c5z.fsf@gnus.org> <87wrlfhcx0.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296846936 25250 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2011 19:15:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 04 20:15:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlR7u-0000gY-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:15:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlR7t-0006jv-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:15:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54432 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlR7l-0006jD-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlR7d-0003I8-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlR7d-0003Hv-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlR7Z-0000Uq-Gb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:15:05 +0100 Original-Received: from baybryj.net ([198.144.208.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:15:05 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by baybryj.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:15:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: baybryj.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7nqswocV5Nbs/ZNl0jwV6HfjlRA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135586 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76366 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Sure. It may not work to autodetect gmail.com with Google Apps, if > those support the IMAP access, since they run under another domain name. > Can someone knowledgeable about that comment? If my suspicion is right, > it would have to be a backend slot variable. The greeting is * OK Gimap ready for requests from 198.144.208.130 k9if2067598fax.47 so if we just match for "OK Gimap", then we should probably be safe. I'm wondering whether to over-engineer this by adding a quirks mode mechanism, or whether to just special-case this in the -request-accept function, or, hm. I'd really prefer that Gnus queried the user instead of the backend, but Gnus knows absolutely nothing about this, so I guess it would make most sense to just add a couple of if statements to nnimap-request-accept, even though it's kinda uglyish. From my viewpoint as a licenced Over Engineer. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen