From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70506 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:21 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87k4n05o0q.fsf@dod.no> References: <87pqwt6lit.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283692618 25985 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2010 13:16:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 13:16:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18881@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 05 15:16:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsF5S-00016x-UU for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsF5N-0002gE-Ks; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:16:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsF5M-0002g0-F3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:16:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OsF5H-0000qn-H8 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:16:40 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OsF5G-0008Lu-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsF5G-00011U-Aj for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:16:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vhd9WrfUy0JTBe/8AuhZm9SPc1g= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70506 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > But there are no folders on a server before somebody has created them, > I'd have thought? There's at least one folder, usually called INBOX (or Inbox, or inbox. That particular folder name is case-insensitive. Whether other folder names are case insensitive or sensitive is implementation-dependent). http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-5.1 > Yuck. On the mail server? Do people set up procmail rules still, in > this day and age? It worked for me in 1995, it works for me now. Why learn something new if the old stuff still works?