From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69747 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: References to my.gnus.org/FAQ Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:18:23 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87k4q1whhc.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8739x2mcyj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fx0ry761.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276544259 11298 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2010 19:37:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18138@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jun 14 21:37:33 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOFTJ-0007Oo-Nh for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:37:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OOFRn-0006mw-NO; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OOFBW-0006iu-GG for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OOFBR-0006so-8N for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from chirelay1o.jumptrading.com ([38.98.147.153] helo=chirelay1.jumptrading.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OOFBQ-0003Uj-00 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:18:56 +0200 Original-Received: from chirelay1.jumptrading.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by chirelay1.jumptrading.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 160D4320002 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:18:25 -0500 (CDT) X-AuditID: 26629395-a36c9bb00000177f-03-4c1680808e51 Original-Received: from chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (unknown [38.98.147.140]) by chirelay1.jumptrading.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id C68202DC005 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:18:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.29) by chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.291.1; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:18:24 -0500 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com ([10.2.14.81]) by internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:18:24 -0500 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: (Tim Landscheidt's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:25:32 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2010 19:18:24.0392 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C059080:01CB0BF6] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69747 Archived-At: On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:25:32 +0000 Tim Landscheidt wrote: TL> I know; I meant are there output options that the Docbook TL> format offers that are *not* feasible with Texinfo and that TL> we consider valuable? Yeah, I think we should only continue with the Texinfo output. Sorry I misunderstood. >> I'm not sure what gnus.cvs.sourceforge.net has. The Gnus CVS repo we >> used for the Git import had texi/gnus-faq.texi with what seems like a >> reasonable VC log. Considering the age of the FAQ, we should either >> clean it up or move it to be part of the manual IMHO. TL> The issue would have been the changes done before and be- TL> tween imports from SourceForge to the Gnus CVS repository. TL> But with Frank's mail that's done. Cleaning up the FAQ is of TL> course still a nice idea :-). I'd be happiest putting the FAQ in the manual so it can cross-reference concepts and sections, and so we don't have to worry about the Docbook format anymore. Frank, Tim, do you think that's reasonable? Ted