From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69288 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: faster gnus-thread-latest-date Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:23 +0000 Message-ID: <87k4wp5y28.fsf@liv.ac.uk> References: <87my1uiien.fsf@uwo.ca> <87hbs2yw7f.fsf@uwo.ca> <87aaxt6zwy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <873a3lj89l.fsf@uwo.ca> <87y6lbfs42.fsf@uwo.ca> <87d42m2ozw.fsf@uwo.ca> <871vj1184a.fsf@uwo.ca> <87bpi2zcak.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260812288 5124 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2009 17:38:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Dan Christensen Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17693@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 14 18:38:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NKErs-0001vb-Lp for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:37:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NKErM-0004DJ-JL; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:37:24 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDdA-0003tk-6i for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:18:40 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDcw-0004QB-Nk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:18:40 -0600 Original-Received: from mail195.messagelabs.com ([85.158.138.147]) by quimby.gnus.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1NKDcv-0003l9-00 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:18:25 +0100 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: D.Love@liverpool.ac.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-195.messagelabs.com!1260807505!65405846!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [138.253.100.62] Original-Received: (qmail 30921 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 16:18:25 -0000 Original-Received: from mxg.liv.ac.uk (HELO mxg.liv.ac.uk) (138.253.100.62) by server-2.tower-195.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 16:18:25 -0000 Original-Received: from mailhube.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.100.157]) by mxg.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDcu-0005UP-VE; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mailhube.liv.ac.uk) by mailhube.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDcu-0005j3-Tv; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:24 +0000 Original-Received: from pc102091.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.102.91] helo=albion) by mailhube.liv.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDcu-0005iy-QE; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:24 +0000 Original-Received: from dlove by albion with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKDct-0001sE-Tq; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:23 +0000 X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+imap.liv.ac.uk:Misc" 6065) In-Reply-To: <87bpi2zcak.fsf@uwo.ca> (Dan Christensen's message of "Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:25:55 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69288 Archived-At: Dan Christensen writes: >> I don't know from where this was Cc'd, as I only got the Cc address >> without a To. > > Sorry, it's from ding@gnus.org, which I read via > gmane.emacs.gnus.general. That might have been put in the Newsgroups > header, but I understand why that might have been confusing. This post > is the same. Sort of sorry from me. I forget when I'm reading stuff at work that it comes through the magnificent MS Exchange, which not only mangles headers, but also bodies. `Newsgroups' was actually there in the original, so it wasn't Gnus' fault. > Well, I guess we shouldn't apply the date-to-time patch then, although > it would be better if we really knew what the problem was and could fix > it without slowing things down by a factor of 4. Sorry I didn't stash an example but, especially as I made the change on 2000-01-06, I'm pretty sure the problematic dates I found were just double-digit years, though there are doubtless others. Maybe it's enough to check for nulls in (in?)appropriate places in the result of parse-time-string?