From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69252 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Issue with nnml backend and gnus-group-get-new-news() Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:17:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87k4x6wit6.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <38b2ab8a0911300136v4593c4b6y41a072ea0f606475@mail.gmail.com> <87bpik2vam.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <38b2ab8a0911300233x3de8d5e6hb1ab52551af51f65@mail.gmail.com> <87pr7019m4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <38b2ab8a0911300516q2357e2d5wf9b986b3f21204b7@mail.gmail.com> <878wdo16be.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <38b2ab8a0911300548y1c1c965bkbbc1ba8b8c55de76@mail.gmail.com> <878wdnuigm.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <38b2ab8a0912010413k7dd402actfda0b1b7352b27af@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259698753 6091 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2009 20:19:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Francis Moreau Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17657@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 01 21:19:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFZBg-0006CT-D2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:19:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NFZA1-0002MM-N2; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:21 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NFZ9y-0002M0-KM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:18 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NFZ9v-0006T2-Qg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:18 -0600 Original-Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1NFZ9t-0004Fr-00 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:17:14 +0100 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD742C61CD; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:17:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:17:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=MzHYTJv81MTIMneYostQkJ90Yyk=; b=M9luxJkr6ZdPKCzd5nwUWvTXokVQso9LnELCAy6QxEJBGZVW5lGVkP55/XIQg66dnKj2ibzxDVVUCIpznPkOhn6GFHbEK1zpTQiawyitn7KpUpx36yp1qmLcz1TqMFG//krbC7rsVXxAaVlVjykZj054864r4O8mKFILdKNf5LA= X-Sasl-enc: ACY153O/wDDsPp7qD6Tv1qmes8k+4CEAw0YtndcacBXS 1259698632 Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (p54AF1046.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.16.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5B67825B7; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:17:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <38b2ab8a0912010413k7dd402actfda0b1b7352b27af@mail.gmail.com> (Francis Moreau's message of "Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69252 Archived-At: Francis Moreau writes: Hi Francis! >> Hm, what does M-x nnmail-split-history RET say? > > So I tried different values for the prefix and here are the ouptut of > M-x nnmail-split-history for each values. For each values, a mail was > previously sent and should reach my 'Inbox' group. > > 'g' Ok -> Inbox:2599 > '1 g' Ok -> Inbox:2600 > > '2 g' Ko -> Inbox:17 > '3 g' Ko -> Inbox:18 > '4 g' Ko -> Inbox:19 > '5 g' Ko -> Inbox:20 > > 'g' Ok -> Inbox:2601 > > Ok means that the mail finally was delivered to the right group > ('Inbox'), otherwise Ko, the mail is stuck in the 'Incoming' stage. > > As you can see the sequence number after "Inbox::" seems to have been > reset in the non working case. Oh, that's interesting. Please enter your Inbox and do `j 17', ..., `j 20', and check if those messages are indeed the new ones, which are also there as Incoming files. If that's indeed the case, then it seems possible that old mails are overwritten, which would be an extremely serious bug. Another possibility would be that in that case Gnus reuses article numbers of already deleted messages, and the fetching somehow assumes that they always increase, and so the new ones with old article numbers aren't recognized as being new. In any case, please write a bug report (M-x gnus-bug) with a very detailed description. The trace analysis you did above is good. Bye, Tassilo