From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68748 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: auth-source patch for secure logging Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87k52714h1.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> References: <87vdlsr9jy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zlb4iqxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r5wfkxh3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87iqhrkwpq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247863485 22263 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2009 20:44:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 17 22:44:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MRuIH-0005F2-7Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:44:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRuIG-0003Pp-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRtKB-000798-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRtK6-000769-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRtK6-000762-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39145) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRtK5-0007iH-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2009 19:42:22 -0000 Original-Received: from p54863E3C.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO turtle.gmx.de) [84.134.62.60] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 21:42:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/mp/AQFSnm651bWlXq3IBalz/4C37tqG/MIptsqV bAjvRyUskhAfrO Original-Received: by turtle.gmx.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83222354A2; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:42:18 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Ted Zlatanov , ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87iqhrkwpq.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:09:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112639 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68748 Archived-At: On 2009-07-17 20:09 +0200, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:01:21 -0400 Glenn Morris wrote: > > GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote: > GM> It seems it got checked into the branch. >>> >>> I checked it into the Gnus CVS trunk. It should have been synchronized >>> with the Emacs CVS trunk only. What branch are you referring to? > > GM> The EMACS_23_1_RC release branch in Emacs CVS. > > GM> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2009-07/msg00480.html > > Right, I know about this branch, I was just making sure we're discussing > the same thing. I don't know how it got into the 23.1 RC branch, sorry. Relating trunks and branches, should not Gnus branch as well for the 5.12 release? I thought that this release was planned to happen at about the same time as the Emacs 23.1 release. > As I mentioned, it was not my intention that it would. Maybe Miles' > synchronization script misfired. BTW, is it agreed that Gnus trunk should continue to be synced with the Emacs trunk? Cheers, Sven