Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el

[asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)]

On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:10:46 +0200, Adam wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:14:44 -0500, Ted wrote:

>>> I've only got the "ham-marked articles in nnml:spam should be
>>> moved as well as processed"-problem left.

>> See spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine for the exact mechanics of this.

Okay, I found out why. In spam-summary-prepare-exit, almost at the
bottom, spam-ham-move-routine is called if and only if the current
group is classified as a spam-group.

This seems to contradict the documentation, where it says:

     So, when you exit a group, the `spam-processors' are applied, if any
  are set, and the processed mail is moved to the
  `ham-process-destination' or the `spam-process-destination' depending
  on the article's classification.  If the `ham-process-destination' or
  the `spam-process-destination', whichever is appropriate, are `nil',
  the article is left in the current group.

   - Spam ELisp Package Sequence of Events

The documentation doesn't mention the codes requirement that the group
be classified as spam for ham to be moved.

I think the code should change, what do you think?


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Mr. Cotton's... parrot. Same question."                     Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk