From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49366 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Fuchs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What method do *you* use for signing Usenet posts? Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 23:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87k7h0af7g.fsf@eris.void.at> References: <87d6mtf3tq.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <87znpwrjoa.fsf@unix.home> <87el78eqce.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <87hec4g22z.fsf@unix.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043019117 10700 80.91.224.249 (19 Jan 2003 23:31:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 23:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18aOux-0002mR-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:31:56 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18aOve-0002cJ-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:32:39 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:33:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21830 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:33:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18aOtw-0002j3-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:30:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18aOtv-0002iu-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:30:51 +0100 Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Url: http://asf.void.at/ X-Attribution: asf Cancel-Lock: sha1:EXGyA5RdnMTwEJ0AJgMaWShlcJk= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49366 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49366 Today, Vasily Korytov wrote: >>>>>> "KS" == Kirk Strauser writes: > KS> Gotcha. I don't know my way around PGG well enough yet to know > KS> how to do so. Can it do this? > > Surely. But PGG setup has nothing to do with it. Just remove `mime' > from the tag to sign the message (i.e. <#secure method=pgpmime > mode=sign>). You can see the result in this message -- I use Oort from > CVS and gpg.el (PGG should work as well). I wonder - why does the user have to decide such things? Would it not make more sense to just specify the method and let gnus itself figure out whether it should use mime or not (i.e. if there is a mime part, use detached signatures, if not, use plain pgp)? -- Andreas Fuchs, , asf@jabber.at, antifuchs