From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/40416 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matt Armstrong" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gpg-ring.el/gpg.el? Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:05:07 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87k7wmle6k.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> References: <87k7wqjzvo.fsf@mclinux.com> <87lmh6mm62.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87bshyvm55.fsf@mclinux.com> <87snbalgcp.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87herqeecu.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175969 780 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:52:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 6222 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 20:06:47 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2001 20:06:47 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 165ufe-0005xR-00; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:05:34 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:05:18 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA06196 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:05:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 6181 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2001 20:05:12 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 6176 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2001 20:05:12 -0000 Original-Received: from hank.lickey.com (sigsegv@64.81.100.235) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2001 20:05:12 -0000 Original-Received: from squeaker.lickey.com (squeaker.lickey.com [192.168.100.10]) by hank.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A7FEE2B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:05:11 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837D2BFFF for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:05:11 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5100FBFE9; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:05:10 -0700 (MST) Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87herqeecu.fsf@mclinux.com> (Josh Huber's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:43:13 -0500") Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA v0.41/Python 1.5.2 (linux2) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40416 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40416 Josh Huber writes: > "Matt Armstrong" writes: > >> It could be done during a pre-processing run -- if a $secure tag is >> > > Right, but I think you wouldn't need to do explicitly sign each > part. Personally, the behavior I'd be looking for would be the > automatic wrapping of the whole message with a multipart/mixed part, > and then signing that part. Yes, I agree completely. The current per-part signing and encryption controls should still be available for the power users. But most folks think of signing and encryption as an attribute of the whole message, so a global flag is a better default. -- matt