From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36067 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: my 'dated' address (was Re: Quimby Upgrade) Date: 29 Apr 2001 17:46:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87k843bte7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <20010412214301.13340.qmail@nightshade.acl.lanl.gov> <01Apr27.154830edt.115489@gateway.intersys.com> <20010427160208.C17435@kens.com> <01Apr27.170545edt.115524@gateway.intersys.com> <01Apr27.173712edt.115316@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171715 6595 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:41:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 3026 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2001 15:34:21 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 3021 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 15:34:21 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 15:34:21 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.29 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m14ttDG-001X0IC; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 17:34:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14ttCM-0007UB-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 17:33:22 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14ttPU-0001EI-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 17:46:56 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "29 Apr 2001 15:26:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36067 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36067 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes: > Any volunteers for MailMan? I run several small lists with Mailman, and apart from some strange issues (administrative requests are put into some sort of queue which has to be processed regularly by a cron job, the Sender: header on administrative messages causes problems with a commonly used agent), it operates quite nicely. However, I've not tried to run really big lists using it.