From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35073
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: why `system-name' is bad for Message-IDs (was Re: `user-mail-address' for message-ids)
Date: 28 Feb 2001 03:52:42 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87k86bmscl.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <20010223133030.B14991@mastaler.com>
	<m3elwpi07k.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<puid7c9c9y7.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<m31ysphvj5.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<pui4rxlc8ij.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<vafhf1knv10.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilupug8qc1j.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> <2n3dd26bjw.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet>
	<877l2e1wp6.fsf@wesley.springies.com>
	<puik86bk6rr.fsf_-_@cyan.acl.lanl.gov> <874rxfobpy.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<puiae77fvjj.gnus@cyan.acl.lanl.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170875 1040 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:27:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:27:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7B0D049D
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:52:42 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB26723;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:52:32 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:51:36 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18249
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:51:23 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mail.netic.de (mail.s.netic.de [212.9.160.11])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508A8D049D
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:51:54 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 212.9.163.51
	via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp
	for mail.gnus.org
	id m14XwiT-001WyuC; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:51:49 +0100 (CET)
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14XwYB-0002sU-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:41:11 +0100
Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14XwjK-0001SN-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:52:42 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <puiae77fvjj.gnus@cyan.acl.lanl.gov> ("Jason R. Mastaler"'s message of "27 Feb 2001 18:25:36 -0700")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 11
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35073
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35073

"Jason R. Mastaler" <jason@libertine.org> writes:

> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> 
> > That's a problem with your personal setup.
> 
> You call it a "problem", but many people call it a useful feature.

What feature?  The feature that your blindforwarding setup does not
filter out addr-specs which look like message IDs (and the local-parts
'fsf' and 'fsf_-_')?