From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33317
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: dme@dme.org
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: someone broke message-newline-and-reformat
Date: 11 Nov 2000 18:35:02 +0000
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87k8aabbmx.fsf@serafina-pekkala.dme.org>
References: <eyu29goy2t.fsf@video.uic.vsu.ru>
	<874s1gm1al.fsf@serafina-pekkala.dme.org>
	<eyem0jq2lf.fsf@video.uic.vsu.ru>
	<vafsnoz4vnx.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169448 24522 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:04:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru>, ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863FCD049A
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 13:35:52 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB15163;
	Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:35:35 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:34:56 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01150
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:34:42 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDC6D049A
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 13:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from serafina-pekkala.dme.org ([212.240.232.117])
	by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 13ufUU-0002sy-0Y; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:35:03 +0000
Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
In-Reply-To: <vafsnoz4vnx.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33317
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33317

* Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE [2000-11-10 16:52:02]
| On 10 Nov 2000, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
| >         (when (looking-at " *\\(\\w\\|[-._]\\)*>+[ \t]*\\|[]>=BB|:}+ \t=
]*")
|=20
| I'd be glad if these regexes weren't hard-coded.  There are variables
| gnus-cite-prefix-regexp and gnus-supercite-regexp, as well as
| gnus-supercite-secondary-regexp.

gnus-cite-prefix-regexp is the relevant one (the others match
supercite attribution lines rather than body citation).  With two
small additional changes (append space when inserting and use \w
rather than . (as per Vladimir)) this appears to work satisfactorily
for both supercite and `normal' citation prefixes.

| Another idea is that we might need to move gnus-cite-prefix-regexp and
| gnus-supercite-regexp to message-* variables since message.el is
| supposed to be usable without Gnus (but not vice versa).

I've done that and added (require 'message) to gnus-cite.el - is there
a better way to do this ?  I'll post a diff after some more testing.

The documentation also changes slightly.

dme.