From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24807 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Wide reply problems Date: 25 Aug 1999 18:00:35 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87k8qj7sv0.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <7t1n1vhxskj.fsf@fly.srk.fer.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162310 10761 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:05:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06642 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAB24331; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:01:16 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:01:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12932 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:01:29 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06613 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:00:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11JfTY-0008Hw-00 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:00:36 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > > See the variable rmail-dont-reply-to-names. This is a strange name > > for a Gnus variable, but that's really it! > > It doesn't seem to be a gnus variable. It's a "message" variable. If you take a look at the guts of `message-reply', you'll find this: ;; Remove addresses that match `rmail-dont-reply-to-names'. (insert (prog1 (rmail-dont-reply-to (buffer-string)) (erase-buffer))) I think it would be logical to do what Lars did with most of the other mail- and rmail- variables: invent a new, message-specific one, and perhaps default it to the value of rmail- one, if it is available.