From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21932 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnmail-split-header-length-limit is EVIL! Date: 16 Mar 1999 08:25:02 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87k8whq4kx.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <87sobotazh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87u2vxfn00.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159945 25506 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:25:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA07810 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 02:26:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB27095; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 01:25:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 16 Mar 1999 01:25:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA24210 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 01:25:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA07801 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 02:25:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 10MoDm-0004Oe-00; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 08:25:02 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h writes: > One thing just occurred to me -- why do I remove the long lines > before I know whether they are a problem or not? I could just catch > the regexp error, and then remove the offending lines, and re-run > the match... Because there is no clearly defined "regexp error". At least I recall you mentioning regexps that take hours to match, or something like that.