From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80450 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: problem with gnus-group-make-nnir-group Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:19:20 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lis1t6xz.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <877h3ub3nc.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87ipndr6cd.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87lis6cp4l.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d3delbch.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> <87ehxue23n.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320081620 19607 80.91.229.12 (31 Oct 2011 17:20:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28736@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 31 18:20:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWy-0005wa-4o for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:20:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWM-00086W-1W; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:19:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWK-00086O-TE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWJ-0005x9-06 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWF-0004Sj-Ie for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:19:31 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKvWE-0005al-Bo for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:19:30 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:19:30 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:19:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:u+gtVHb1ZCREowe9BhkDhmlyqiY= X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80450 Archived-At: On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:00:44 +0100 "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" wrote: jao> In my version of Gnus (corresponding to a recent emacs snapshot), the jao> problem is with the body of nnir-mode, which starts as (nnir.el:1741): jao> (defun nnir-mode () jao> (when (eq (car (gnus-find-method-for-group gnus-newsgroup-name)) 'nnir) jao> (setq gnus-summary-line-format jao> (or nnir-summary-line-format gnus-summary-line-format)) jao> (when (gnus-bound-and-true-p gnus-registry-enabled) jao> But both `gnus-registry-enabled' *and* `gnus-bound-and-true-p' are jao> undefined when nnir is loaded. gnus-registry.el does define the former, jao> but not the latter function, and in my emacs session jao> (fboundp 'gnus-bound-and-true-p) returns nil. I don't know how that's possible. nnir.el has (defvar gnus-registry-enabled) and loads gnus-util.el, which defines `gnus-bound-and-true-p'. So this problem should not happen, and does not happen on the Gnus Buildbot either. Can you think of something that could be causing the problem for you but not for me and the Buildbot? Thanks Ted