From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80355 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Anyone with working nnimap => gmail Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:02:27 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87lisibdos.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87wrc41wxl.fsf@newsguy.com> <8739est55u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87hb374qm0.fsf@newsguy.com> <87ehyb336h.fsf@newsguy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318946583 6304 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2011 14:03:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:03:03 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28643=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Oct 18 16:03:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFu-0005xP-Up for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:02:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFu-0006Uz-4i for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:02:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFt-0006Uu-7n for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFs-0005U0-6j for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFo-0005mC-I4 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:02:52 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAFn-0005vO-5U for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:02:51 +0200 Original-Received: from c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.179.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:02:51 +0200 Original-Received: from reader by c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:02:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 45 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NO2NZd/kIiNbn1R2gOJi378n1Go= X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80355 Archived-At: Richard Riley writes: > Harry Putnam writes: > >> Richard Riley writes: >> >>> Harry Putnam writes: >>> >>>> Eric S Fraga writes: >>>>> I am not sure I understand this. What does not appear? The email >>>>> itself? Have you tried looking at all the contents of your inbox, say >>>>> using /o from the summary view? >>>> >>>> Sorry I made it sound complicated... I just mean: >>>> New mail on gmail does not show up on gnus as new mail. >>>> Sometimes its there but marked read, sometimes it not there at all. >>>> And no /o does not show it either. >>>> >>>> In an instant case, I see 1 new message on gmail (in web browser). >>>> I've left it there for 2 days now. It has NOT appeared in gnus nnimap >>>> folder `INBOX' or `All Mail' yet. >>> >>> You pressed "g" from the group buffer? >>> gnus-group-get-new-news >> >> Yes, but of course, that would have run on the 2 fresh startups I >> mentioned anyway. > > Not necessarily. You can configure fetch levels. Did you perhaps do > that? In my case it does. > In which case normal startup and "g" wont fetch your inbox if the level > is below that of the defalt. In my case it does. > Do "C-u 9 g" and see. This is not the issue period. Those groups are at the same level as all other groups that are scanned with `g', plus I've repeatedly done M-g on them. `C-u 9 g' does nothing new here.