Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: can Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker?
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:47:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6iy64gxk4z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:23:56 -0400 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote: 

GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> After some discussion on the Gnus mailing list we wanted to propose that
>> Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker.  Rationale:
...
>> This will get fun when XEmacs users report bugs against Emacs+Gnus for
>> XEmacs compatibility.  So maybe for them we can set up a special bug
>> category, passed to the bug tracker in the subject or in the headers.

GM> That's not a complete solution though, because Gnus also supports older
GM> Emacs releases, and we don't want those reports to go to the
GM> bug-gnu-emacs list...

There was a point where Gnus was merged into Emacs.  Do we want that to
be the separation point?  Or do we want all non-trunk reports to go to
Gnus only?  I'm not sure.

GM> Anyway, to some extent you can do this already.
GM> For some time, "gnus" has existed as debbugs.gnu.org package, with a
GM> maintainer address of bugs@gnus.org. This is why you will see numbered
GM> bug mail from debbugs.gnu.org appearing at that address: either someone
GM> reported a bug against the gnus package, or, more commonly, I reassigned
GM> it from "emacs" to "emacs,gnus", so that subsequent mails go to both
GM> addresses.

I wondered how that worked.  Thank you for the help.

GM> So really all that is needed is to use "Package: gnus" in the first line
GM> of a mail to submit@debbugs. Using "Package: emacs,gnus" causes both
GM> bugs@gnus.org and bug-gnu-emacs to get mails. You can do this today with
GM> zero other changes required.

We can change `gnus-bug' to add the Package line according to the
version logic from above.

GM> With regards to making it more "official", personally I hesitate a bit.
GM> debbugs.gnu.org is a GNU machine and the set-up is intended for GNU
GM> projects. Do you regard Gnus as a GNU project? GNU Gnus? I know Gnus is
GM> part of Emacs, but eg

GM> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnus

GM> does not exist, and I don't seem to find a statement on
GM> http://www.gnus.org/. There don't seem to be any mentions in the Gnus
GM> manual either. Stand-alone Gnus is not distributed on ftp.gnu.org. Etc,
GM> etc.

Sorry, I don't know the answers to those questions.

Ted




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 16:38 Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 17:40 ` Chong Yidong
2011-03-15 18:27   ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 19:32   ` Glenn Morris
2011-03-15 19:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-15 19:23 ` Glenn Morris
2011-03-15 19:41   ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 19:47   ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2011-03-15 23:27     ` Glenn Morris
2011-03-16 14:00       ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-16 15:41         ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-16 15:58           ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-16 17:51             ` Glenn Morris
2011-03-16 17:55               ` Glenn Morris
2011-03-16 19:41                 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-16 17:32         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-16 18:44           ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-17 16:52             ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-17 17:27               ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-17 17:40                 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-17 19:12                   ` Ted Zlatanov
     [not found]                   ` <3tmxkty6up.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
2011-03-18  8:33                     ` Reiner Steib
2011-03-18 13:04                       ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-29 18:53                         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-29 19:09                           ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-06-28 15:31                           ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-06-28 15:33                   ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 20:31   ` Chong Yidong
2011-03-15 20:45     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com \
    --to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).