From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76408 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:49:08 +0900 Message-ID: <87lj1t1wuz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <83ei7makon.fsf@gnu.org> <838vxuaek9.fsf@gnu.org> <877hdebm01.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <831v3ma532.fsf@gnu.org> <8739o2bjci.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83wrle8p8q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296975516 23167 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2011 06:58:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 07:58:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlyZr-0000Hx-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:58:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38952 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlyZq-0005Cp-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48022 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlyZl-0005Ck-3r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlyZk-0004Zh-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:50504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlyZh-0004ZH-Gl; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FBA97069B; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:58:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D80D91A2C59; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:49:08 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83wrle8p8q.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" ed3b274cc037 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135635 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76408 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > By "user" I _did_ mean developers in this case. How do we prevent the > danger of committing a modified file? By using a real branch instead of a checkout.